Rabbits Provide Vital Source of Income

As one of the most popular pets in America, rabbits fill many roles here—pet, cartoon character, Easter egg porter.

But for many families rabbits are more than just cute animals; they create a vital source of income.

Rabbits Make a Great Gift

Photo by Russell Powell, courtesy of Heifer International.

The small animals rely on simple foods, such as grass and vegetables, to eat, and they do not require large areas of land to thrive. Moreover, the manure they produce fertilizes the land and enhances its productivity, a hugely valuable asset for a smallholder farmer.

These sturdy animals reproduce swiftly; they can have six litters of four to 12 babies, or kits, each year. Additionally, the offspring mature quickly, which means Heifer participants can Pass on the Gift in a few months, compared to the year or two it takes to share the offspring of a larger animal, such as a cow.

A gift of a rabbit transforms a family’s life, providing extra income for to buy more and better food, access health care and pay children’s school fees.

Anthonio Louis Fritznel organized a group of peers to raise rabbits to improve the La Sucrerie community in southern Haiti. Watch this video and see the impact rabbits can make on a community.

This holiday season, consider giving a trio of rabbits to help more people like Anthonio.

This post is part of our What to Give series, where we’re helping you choose the best Heifer gift for your loved ones. Read previous What to Give posts here, and subscribe to the What to Give series here.

Still don’t know what to give? Visit our full catalog page here.

Heifer International From the Field: Business Success Builds Confidence

This weekly post shines a light on a handful of stories from Heifer International’s “From the Field” section on Heifer.org.
Heifer International
The self-confidence that running a successful enterprise provides is transformative.

Before women in India’s Kiro ki Dhani village formed a Heifer Self-Help Group, they lacked confidence, always speaking in whispers and hiding their faces when speaking in their veils. After they formed the group, they pooled their money and awarded loans to group members.

Photo courtesy of Heifer International

The individual members bought goats, cows and plots of land to expand their agricultural enterprises. Their success gave them confidence and motivated them to continue improving their lives. They feel empowered and are respected. They dug deep wells in their village, brought electricity to their village and traveled across India to meet other women’s groups and offered support based on their own experience.

In Armenia, students in Heifer’s YES! Youth Club spent the past year studying business. The students began various income-generating activities based on the available resources and their geographic locations, including raising garlic, breeding animals, honey production and selling baked goods. The experience of running a small business gave these burgeoning entrepreneurs confidence.

Armenian project participant Avet had to think quickly to save his business when a hailstorm approached his garlic field. He had to find a solution to protect his garlic, so he built a roof to cover his vegetables. “This was the first time in my life that the whole responsibility was on me, and I made it,” he said. “I was really proud of myself that day.”

Heifer understands the relationship between business success and confidence. In Ukraine, Heifer and its project partners are launching a learning farm to teach co-op members further about modern farming practices. The business techniques that participants will implement after receiving training will ensure their success. The confidence the success gives will motivate them to continue innovating and improving their lives.

Provide Education for Girls on Universal Children’s Day

Uneducated women live a limited life. They have few personal choices about marriage, the number of children they will have and how their family will spend its money. Education for girls is a key element in fighting hunger and poverty.

Limited Lives

Education For Girls

Photo courtesy of Heifer International.

Due to their marginalized status in many areas of the world, women’s movements are often restricted to the home, and they are not welcome to participate in making personal or community decisions. Their husbands dictate their lives. Their lack of education coupled with their low status severely limits income-generating opportunities. Moreover, their social subordination places them at a high risk for domestic violence, and if they become widows or their marriage ends, trafficking.

People in many places still believe spending money on sending a girl to school is pointless. And if she is lucky enough to get to go, when income is limited, the family often will stop her schooling in favor of spending the money on her brothers’ school fees. When half of the population isn’t fulfilling its potential, the entire community suffers.

Education for Girls Changes Women’s Lives

Basic education for girls changes their lives. The Strey Tbong Pich women’s group in Cambodia has learned to read and write thanks to training through a Heifer International project. They can now learn about sanitation and nutrition, keep financial records and have access to more income-generating opportunities.

“Before joining the group and attending the literacy class, our family had never drunk boiled water,” said 37-year-old Kan Nai Ky from the Strey Tbong Pich women’s group. “Our house was not hygienic, as we had never cared about waste around our house, and there was no sanitation inside the house. Since studying the literacy book on improving the environment, we know the importance of good hygiene, sanitation and the environment. Now we always boil the water before drinking.”

Imagine if these women had learned to read when they were girls. What different lives might they have led?

One of our newest items in the Heifer International Gift Catalog is Send a Girl to School. The gift provides a family in need with training and livestock so they can earn the income they need to pay for their daughter’s school fees and supplies. Education for girls is one of the surest ways to break the cycle of poverty and dependence in a community.

Universal Children’s Day is Today

Celebrate this Universal Children’s Day by changing the future for a girl. This holiday, created in 1954 by the United Nations, works to benefit the interests of children by limiting long-work hours and increasing access to education.

This Universal Children’s Day, help provide education for girls by giving now. Your holiday gift for a loved one can truly transform the lives of others.

This post is part of our What to Give series, where we’re helping you choose the best Heifer gift for your loved ones. Read previous What to Give posts here, and subscribe to the What to Give series here.

Still don’t know what to give? Check out our entire online Gift Catalog.

 

 

Could Interactive Games Change the World?

This week, Asi Burak, Co-President of Games for Change, and Emily Treat, Games For Change Senior Producer, joined us at our offices for a game development workshop. I had the chance to sit down with Asi and Emily to ask them about this burgeoning medium and how people can use interactive games to engage with the causes they care about.
Could you tell us about how you got into gaming?
Asi: “I did entertainment mobile-based games when I was inIsrael. That was in the early days of mobile. Then I came to Carnegie Mellon[University]. When I left Israel, it was the first time for me to blend theideas of a game project and the Mideast conflict. That’s when we did ‘Peacemaker.’”
What made you decide to make the transition to games thathelp achieve good?
Asi: “It was ‘Peacemaker.’ It was a wild ride — as much as Idid it for passion, it was also the passion to change a medium. We believegames will become the most dominant medium of our time. We’re like those whomade the first documentaries. It’s about, ‘How far can we push it? How can wetackle the most serious issues of our time?’”
Emily: “I also studied at Carnegie Mellon. As an undergrad Ihad taken a class in video game design. Coming out of an art major, I was veryinterested in the idea of collaborative, creative fields. Coming back forgraduate school, that’s when I got interested in the idea of games foreducation. I think at that point I realized that you can do far more with agame than just do a fun experience. Since graduation, all the projects I’dworked on were games for learning opportunities. Later, I looked to expand thisbeyond just academic games. I share with Asi the feeling that we can remake thesame games again and again, or do games for social impact. It’s a genre thathasn’t been completely explored.”
What is the overall mission of Games for Change?
Asi: “We’re a non-profit, and we’re building a sector. That’sour main mission…to take this field — a genre and idea — to the extentpossible. What happens for many people and organizations is that their firstcontact is with Games For Change. For some projects, we give the firstresponse…even in terms of advice. From there, some projects move forward. Westart with a workshop where we sit down and look at the idea. And some projectsgo on to development.”
Are you putting organizations in contact with others who canhelp?
Asi: “Yes. One thing that we’re saying is that to create a goodproduct you can’t do it alone — especially if you’re coming from outside thefield. It’s about multi-stakeholder partnerships. We’re trying to make surethat an organization understands that they need to find the best resources fordevelopment, content and funding. When it comes to development, organizationsshould find developers who speak gaming. They also need to do their research,especially when it comes to working in the developing world. They need to mapthe technology, the landscape, etc.”
Why should those who are concerned about the issues ofhunger and poverty care about this trend of games for social good?
Asi: “If you believe media canchange minds, then you should absolutely explore games. People are therealready…especially the younger generation. That’s the power: they’re alreadythere, spending the time, purchasing and downloading content. I would say theother aspect is that there are attributes to games that map to social impact. What happens in a game is that you takesomeone who is interacting with the experiences and you’re able to make themunderstand the complexities of an issue in a way you can’t in any other medium.You also get people who are already interactive and they’re one click away fromtaking action. When you get someone into the action of the game, they’re in themindset of being immersed or being fully engaged. To move them from the game totaking action will be a natural extension if the game is designed well.”
Emily: “There are deep, emotional experiences in games. Gamescan let the player take risks without consequences. They can challenge theirown beliefs in a game in a way they can’t through a book or other medium.”
Asi, you have said that interactive games comprise a $60 billion peryear industry worldwide. What portion of that belongs to games for social good?Do you see that shifting more toward the social good side?
Asi: “It’s shifting, but it’s very early, and it’s a small segmentout of the large pie. The main reason is that there’s no real market place —like any young industry — there’s no ‘games store’ where you can find allsocial good games. In some cases, you‘re making the game for an audience thatmight not have access to such a marketplace, like in remote villages.”
Emily: “There’s an inherent disconnect…it seems counterintuitiveto charge money for a game that is intended to raise awareness. Charity gamesdon’t yet have a structure for monetization.”
Do you see a lot of hunger relief organizationsthat use games as part of their outreach strategy? Do you thinkthere is potential for these types of organizations to do more with gaming?
Emily: “Not a lot [of organizations], but there are some good examples. ‘FreeRice’ is one such game. I wouldn’t say that every organization is thinkingabout that as a direction. A lot of smaller organizations don’t have funding toproduce games. There’s definitely more potential, but many organizations haven’tyet decided to make it a priority.”
What advice do you have for organizations that are thinkingabout using gaming as a strategy to achieve their goals?
Emily: “First, figure out what you want to use gaming for.Put it down on paper and get one clear, defined goal so you can go back to itas you develop the game and decide what it will be and how you’ll reach youraudience, Don’t do a game that goes against your goals. Do your homework, lookat other games and figure out what you want. You should also take the timethink through ideas and paper test them and spend the time to be sure that whatyou’re doing is what your audience wants.”
Asi: “If you go into gaming, do it seriously. What couldhold you back is if you say, ‘I want to try it out,’ but then do it low costand without strategy. You don’t get the most benefit and your funders won’t behappy. To really do it strategically, you need to think through how you couldbenefit from it. ‘How does it fit my audience and how does this fit into thelarger context?’ One advantage that technology has given us in the last fewyears — games no longer need to be expensive. One example we see more are gamecontests. You crowd source solutions from people all over the world. That couldbe a cost effective way to crowd source information and get people involved.“
Do you think we will reach a point of saturation with socialgood games? Will the market start to see them as noise and tune them out?
Asi: “I think we’re not even scratching the surface andthere aren’t enough success stories. My simple test is to go up to 10 people onthe street, and if nine out of 10 say they haven’t heard about what we’redoing, then we have a long way to go. This hasn’t even become mainstream.”
Emily: “I think there will always be causes that people aregoing to advocate for and support, and causes are going to shift as time goeson. But is there an over saturation of charities? Even if they’re advocating thesame cause, people don’t think, ‘There are too many good causes.’”
What advice would you give someone who wants toget involved and make a difference?
Asi: “One way is to go to the Games for Change website andplay games that were not developed by Games For Change but by developers fromall over the world. We curate a lot of games there. Spend some time there, andsee what these different experiences are like and see where this is going. Forthe more advanced, I would say there are very interesting platforms that letyou create your own thing without being a game developer: Scratch, Game Maker and Gamestar Mechanic. These are labeled as ‘game makingtools,’ and you can actually start playing with what it means to make a goodgame. I’ve seen incredible games made by students in middle school.”
Emily: “Jeff from our New York office got involved bywriting blog posts about these type of games. On our website, there’s a placeto write reviews of games. So that’s another way to get involved. It’s furtheringthe discussion and adding to the dialogue.”
I think our readers would be very interested in your workwith “Half the Sky.” Could you tell us briefly about that project?
Asi: “It’s a multimedia project that’s all based on thebest-selling book about women and girls empowerment in developing countries.The book triggered a TV show that will be on PBS in October. We were tasked by Nicholas Kristof and Sheryl WuDunn tocreate the games for this project. It took years to get to where we are now,and now we have two projects: a Facebook game that’s based on the book and it’sall about how people in the West can get involved in a real, meaningful way anda series of mobile games for very simple devices that we will launch in Indiaand East Africa. Now we’re doing three mobile games with the intent to createmore, and each of these games tackles an issue in a very focused way: maternalhealth, de-worming and family norms, which you could also call girl’s education.So when you think about it, we’re doing one project for people in the West andone project for people who are most affected by these issues. The feedback we’veheard so far — from the NGOs we’re partnering with — has been good. They say it’slike night and day. They’ve gone from using pamphlets and flipboards to mobilegames that are interactive and fun.”

Heifer Works Within the Doughnut

Last week, Kate Raworth of Oxfam International published an Oxfam Discussion Paper, titled “A Safe and Just Space for Humanity: Can We Live Within the Doughnut?” In the video below, Raworth uses illustrations to help explain the concepts detailed in her paper. Watch it, then continue reading below about how Heifer’s work fits right into the doughnut.

Here’s the part that really resonated with me:

Between the social boundaries and the planetary boundaries lies an area shaped like a donut, which is both safe and just space for humanity. And if global economic development is socially inclusive and environmentally sustainable, it would bring humanity into this space and allow it to thrive here.

If you’re already familiar with Heifer’s work, I imagine you’ll agree: This sounds just like Heifer.

Our mission isn’t only to end hunger and poverty. It is also to care for the Earth. Our methods have proven to be both beneficial to our project participants and, at the very least, protective of the environment. We often go beyond protecting the environment when project communities live in landscapes in need of restoration.

To apply Raworth’s illustration to Heifer: Heifer works to bring our participants and their communities up to the “social foundation” line without crossing the “environmental ceiling.” It’s all in our 12 Cornerstones for Just and Sustainable Development, namely Sustainability and Self Reliance, Improved Animal Management, Nutrition and Income, Genuine Need and Justice, Improving the Environment, and Full Participation.

We know it’s possible to live within the doughnut, because we have helped our participants do it for the past 68 years.

World Food Day: Food Prices–From Crisis to Stability

Today is Blog Action Day 2011. It is also World Food Day. This year’s theme for Blog Action Day is Food. Bloggers all over the world are writing about this one theme, from their own unique perspective. To find out more, visit the Blog Action Day website. Read more of our Blog Action Day posts on Heifer Blog here.


Happy World Food Day, everyone.

When you have plenty, food is something to celebrate. For those who lack enough, however, it can be a daily struggle. Food security is defined by the World Health Organization as existing “when all people at all times have access to sufficient, safe, nutritious food to maintain a healthy and active life.” Before Heifer enters the picture, our project participants are food insecure. When you’re food insecure, you might have enough food to feed your family breakfast and lunch, but not dinner. You might have enough food for your children, but not yourself. You might have enough food five days a week, but not seven; or during the harvest months, but not the thin months.

Food insecurity is scary, and there are many factors that contribute to the situation. A significant factor that has been getting a lot of attention lately is the rising cost of food. That’s the theme for this year’s World Food Day: Food Prices–From Crisis to Stability. Today we are called to “look seriously at what causes swings in food prices, and do what needs to be done to reduce their impact on the weakest members of global society.”

Those weakest members of society? Those are Heifer’s participants. At least, that’s one way to describe them before they receive their gifts of training and livestock. Our work can play a big role in helping families protect themselves against the negative impacts of volatile food prices. Because when you’re empowered to grow much of the food your family needs, you’re way less reliant on the global–and even local–food economy. That’s just as true here in the United States, but it’s strikingly more significant in developing countries, which account for 98 percent of the world’s 925 million hungry people in 2010.

What do you think? What else can be done to reduce the impact of rising food costs on the poor and hungry?

Today is also Blog Action Day, which has the appropriate theme of Food this year. Stay tuned here on Heifer Blog for a series of posts by some of our own Heifer staff with their thoughts on food.

Weekly Article Roundup: Preparing for World Food Day 2011

Maegan’s taking a much needed mini-vacation, so it’s Brooke here with your Weekly Article Roundup.

I’d like to use this Roundup to prepare us for World Food Day, which is Sunday.

This year’s topic for World Food Day is Food Prices–From Crisis to Stability. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations wants us to consider what causes major swings in food prices and what can be done to reduce the impact of food prices on the poor and hungry in the world.
We posted about a New York Times editorial back in December 2010 warning of a food crisis in 2011. It’s terribly unfortunate that this prediction has come true. Rising food prices has been a significant factor in the famine in East Africa.
Rising food prices is a complicated situation, and it’s happening over much of the world. In Bolivia, the price for quinoa–an extremely nutritious crop grown and consumed in Bolivia for centuries–has risen to a price many Bolivians can’t afford. The cause: the increased demand for quinoa in the United States and Europe. The effects: poor Bolivians are eating cheaper, less nutritious foods instead.
In June this year, Maegan wrote about the OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2011-2020 and asked us what changes we’ve had to make in our own lives to avoid higher grocery bills
Rising food prices aren’t just affecting the poor in developing countries. Families in the United States are being hit by higher grocery bills. Even Sesame Street is tackling food insecurity.
And if you need a reminder of why we need to work to stabilize food prices–so children and families won’t starve–you can go back to this video and see for yourself. We must act now; we must act fast; we must act big.
In addition to Sunday being World Food Day, it’s also Blog Action Day 2011, which has a complimentary theme of Food. Stay tuned for a series of posts from Heifer staff on topics related to food on Sunday in honor and celebration of the day.

Does Helping the Planet Hurt the Poor?

(Photo from Wall Street Journal)

by Brett Garfinkel

In their Saturday Essay column, The Wall Street Journal asked Peter Singer and Bjorn Lomberg, two global development experts, to respond to this question: Does Helping the Planet Hurt the Poor?

Peter Singer summed up his response as this:

“No, if the west makes sacrifices.”

Bjorn Lomberg summed up his response this way:

“Yes, if we listen to green extremists”

The opposing beliefs of the two are captured in this statement by Bjorn Lomberg:

“…Fortunately, there is a more sensible way forward that could use the same $250 billion that the European Union is expecting to waste annually on ineffective global warming policies. First, we should spend about $100 billion a year on research and development to make green energy cheaper and more widely available. Mr. Singer argues that it is not ethically defensible just to hope for a “technological miracle” that will allow us to end our reliance on fossil fuels…”

Lomberg believes that were going to spend too much money on policies that have to little return on investment and that this capital can be used to help the impoverished with programs that have been time tested.

I would love to open this to the public to see where Heifer supporters stand. Click here for a link to the Wall Street Journal piece.

Editor’s Note: This post originally appeared on the Heifer in Brooklyn blog. 

Good News on the Poverty Front


The total number of the world’s poor fell to 878 million people in 2010 from more than 1 billion in 2005, a new Brookings Institution report shows.

Brookings’ Laurence Chandy and Geoffrey Gertz announced the findings in a Washington Post opinion piece today, linking the news to the World Economic Forum, convening this week in Davos, Switzerland.
In their editorial, they say our understanding of global poverty “remains firmly rooted in the year 2005, the last year for which the World Bank produced data on the number of people living on less than $1.25 a day.”
“A lot has changed in the past six years. The economies of the developing world have expanded 50 percent in real terms, despite the Great Recession. Moreover, growth has been particularly high in countries with large numbers of poor people. India and China, of course, but also Bangladesh, Tanzania, Ethiopia, Vietnam, Uganda, Mozambique and Uzbekistan – nine countries that were collectively home to nearly two-thirds of the world’s poor in 2005 – are all experiencing phenomenal economic advances.”
The new Brookings Institution report, available to download here, updates the World Bank’s official figures to show how the global poverty landscape has changed. The editorial says “we estimate that between 2005 and 2010, nearly half a billion people escaped extreme hardship. Never before in history have so many people been lifted out of poverty in such a short period.”
The editorial concludes “While there is good reason to focus public attention on the need to support those still stuck below the poverty line, there is also reason to celebrate successes and to ensure that policy debates are grounded in reality.”
Heifer International’s successful model focuses on one family at a time, through livestock, fish, bees and innovative agricultural training.
“I have seen families rise above poverty and hunger for good,” says Heifer Tanzania Country Director Peter Mwakabwale. Read more about Heifer’s programs at www.heifer.org and www.heifer.org/worldark.
Photo of Isaya and Restituta Mlelwa, Heifer Tanzania participants by Dave Anderson. The Mlelwas, who started with just one Heifer dairy cow, have now trained thousands throughout Africa on raising dairy cows and organic farming. Restituta Mlelwa just met her dream to travel to Europe, visiting Italy in December to share her knowledge of zero-grazing dairy farming.

Quality of Life: How Do We Rate?

For the eighth time, Norway tops the United Nations’ Human Development Index, a guide to the best countries to live in. Life expectancy, average income, years of schooling, gender equality and political freedom are just some of the indicators used to determine the ranking.
The United States came in fourth, also behind Australia and New Zealand. Zimbabwe, a country Heifer works in, comes in at the very bottom of the 169 nations ranked, where it has been for the last five years.
Read more on the U.N. report here. It’s worth it to dig down into the actual report: Particularly notable are Chapter 2, “The advance of people,” which has a separate section on hunger, and Chapter 5, “Innovations in measuring inequality and poverty.”